Relax, Pluto is still a dog, but is no longer a planet.
Washington Post
After a tumultuous week of clashing over the essence of the cosmos, the International Astronomical Union stripped Pluto of the planetary status it has held since its discovery in 1930. The new definition of what is -- and isn't -- a planet fills a centuries-old black hole for scientists who have labored since Copernicus without one.
Just what are the new rules?
Much-maligned Pluto doesn't make the grade under the new rules for a planet: "a celestial body that is in orbit around the sun, has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a ... nearly round shape, and has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit."
Pluto is automatically disqualified because its oblong orbit overlaps with Neptune's.
Instead, it will be reclassified in a new category of "dwarf planets," similar to what long have been termed "minor planets." The definition also lays out a third class of lesser objects that orbit the sun -- "small solar system bodies," a term that will apply to numerous asteroids, comets and other natural satellites.
This whole planet/not-a-planet thing has been debated ever since I was a kid. I'm not sure why it really matters; Pluto is still exactly the same thing it was when it was discovered in 1930, and it's still just as interesting to NASA. Unless we're in a competition with some other solar system over who has the most planets I don't get the hoopla.
